Perioperative Care and Outcomes of Patients with Brain Tumors Undergoing Elective Craniotomy: Experience from an Ethiopian Tertiary-Care Hospital.

OBJECTIVE: To describe patients, perioperative care, and outcomes undergoing supratentorial and infratentorial craniotomy for brain tumor resection in a tertiary-care hospital in Ethiopia. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study of patients consecutively admitted between January 1, 2021, and December 31, 2021, was performed. We characterized patients, perioperative care, and outcomes. RESULTS: The final sample comprised 153 patients; 144 (94%) were 18 years and over, females (n = 48, 55%) with primarily American Society of Anesthesiologists physical class II (n = 97, 63.4%) who underwent supratentorial (n = 114, 75%), or infratentorial (n = 39, 25%) tumor resection. Patients were routinely admitted (95%) to floor/wards before craniotomy; Inhaled anesthetic (isoflurane 88%/halothane 12%) was used for maintenance of general anesthesia. Propofol (n = 93, 61%), mannitol (n = 73, 48%), and cerebrospinal fluid drain (n = 28, 18%), were used to facilitate intraoperative brain relaxation, while the use of hyperventilation was rare (n = 1). The average estimated blood loss was 1040 ± 727 ml; 37 (24%) patients received tranexamic acid, and 57 (37%) received a blood transfusion. Factors associated with extubation were a) infratentorial tumor location: relative risk (RR) 0.45 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.29-0.69), preoperative hydrocephalus: RR 0.51, (95% CI 0.34-0.79), shorter total anesthesia duration: 277.8 + 8.8 versus 426.77 + 13.1 minutes, P < 0.0001, lower estimated blood loss: 897 + 68 ml versus 1361.7 + 100 ml, P = 0.0002, and cerebrospinal fluid drainage to facilitate brain relaxation: RR 0.52, 95% CI 0.32-0.84). Approximately one in ten patients experienced postoperative obstructive hydrocephalus, surgical site infections, or pneumonia. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that certain factors may impact patient outcomes following craniotomy for tumor resection. By identifying these factors, health care providers may be better equipped to develop individualized treatment plans and improve patient outcomes. Additionally, the study highlights the importance of postoperative monitoring and management to prevent complications.

Critical Care Experience With Clinical Cerebral Autoregulation Testing in Adults With Traumatic Brain Injury.

BACKGROUND: To describe the setting, feasibility, and safety of static cerebral autoregulation testing in critically injured adults with traumatic brain injury (TBI).  Methods: We reviewed static autoregulation testing using transcranial Doppler (TCD) ultrasound in patients > 18 years with TBI ICD codes between January 1, 2014, and December 31, 2021. Adverse events during testing were defined as systemic hypertension (systolic blood pressure (SBP>180 mmHg), bradycardia (HR<40 bpm), and high ICP (>30 mmHg). Impaired and absent cerebral autoregulation was defined as an autoregulatory index (ARI) <0.4 and ARI 0, respectively. We characterized prescribed changes in intracranial pressure (ICP) and cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP) targets by autoregulation testing results.  Results: A total of 135 patients, median age 31 (interquartile range (IQR) 24, 43) years, 71.9% male, admission Glasgow coma scale (GCS) score 3 (IQR 3, 5.5), and 70.9% with subdural hematoma from severe (GCS 3-8; 133 (98.5%)) and moderate (GCS 9-12; 2 (1.5%)) TBI, underwent 309 attempted testing. All patients were mechanically ventilated and had ICP monitoring; 246 (80%) had brain tissue oxygen monitoring, and 68 (22%) had an external ventricular drain. The median number of autoregulation tests was two (range 1-3) tests/patient, and the median admission to the first test time was two days (IQR 1, 3). Of 55 (17.8%) tests not completed, systemic hypertension (32, 10.4%), intracranial hypertension (10, 3.2%), and bradycardia (3, 0.9%) were transient. Fifty-three (51%) of the first (n=104) autoregulation tests showed impaired/absent cerebral autoregulation. Impaired/absent autoregulation results at the first test were associated with repeat cerebral autoregulation testing (RR 2.25, 95% CI [1.40-3.60], p=0.0007) than intact cerebral autoregulation results. Pre-testing cerebral hemodynamic targets were maintained (n=131; 86.8%) when cerebral autoregulation was impaired (n=151; RR 1.49, 95% CI [1.25-1.77], p<0.0001). However, 15 (9.9%) test results led to higher ICP targets (from 20 mmHg to 25 mmHg), 5 (3.3%) results led to an increase in CPP target (from 60 mmHg to 70 mmHg), and five out of 131 (3.8%) patients underwent decompressive craniectomy and placement of an external ventricular drain. Intact cerebral autoregulation results (n=43/103, 41.7%) were associated with a change in ICP targets from 20 mmHg to 25 mmHg (RR 3.15, 95% CI [1.97-5.03], p<0.0001).  Conclusions: Static cerebral autoregulation testing was feasible, safe, and useful in individualizing the care of patients with moderate-severe TBI receiving multimodal neuromonitoring. Testing results guided future testing, cerebral hemodynamic targets, and procedural decisions. Impaired cerebral autoregulation was very common.

Bacterial Brain Abscess and Life-Threatening Intracranial Hypertension Requiring Emergent Decompressive Craniectomy After SARS-CoV-2 Infection in a Healthy Adolescent.

Acute coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection usually results in mild symptoms, but secondary infections after SARS-CoV-2 infection can occur, particularly with comorbid conditions. We present the clinical course of a healthy adolescent with a brain abscess and life-threatening intracranial hypertension requiring emergent decompressive craniectomy after a SARS-CoV-2 infection. A 13-year-old healthy immunized male presented with invasive frontal, ethmoid, and maxillary sinusitis and symptoms of lethargy, nausea, headache, and photophobia due to a frontal brain abscess diagnosed three weeks after symptoms and 11 days of oral amoxicillin treatment. Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) was negative twice but then positive on amoxicillin day 11 (symptom day 21), when magnetic resonance imaging revealed a 2.5-cm right frontal brain abscess with a 10-mm midline shift. The patient underwent emergent craniotomy for right frontal epidural abscess washout and functional endoscopic sinus surgery with ethmoidectomy. On a postoperative day one, his neurological condition showed new right-sided pupillary dilation and decreased responsiveness. His vital signs showed bradycardia and systolic hypertension. He underwent an emergent decompressive craniectomy for signs of brain herniation. Bacterial PCR was positive for Streptococcus intermedius, for which he received intravenous vancomycin and metronidazole. He was discharged home on hospital day 14 without neurological sequelae and future bone flap replacement. Our case highlights the importance of timely recognition and treatment of brain abscess and brain herniation in patients with neurological symptoms after SARS-CoV-2 infection, even in otherwise healthy patients.

Experience with clinical cerebral autoregulation testing in children hospitalized with traumatic brain injury: Translating research to bedside.

Objective: To report our institutional experience with implementing a clinical cerebral autoregulation testing order set with protocol in children hospitalized with traumatic brain injury (TBI). Methods: After IRB approval, we examined clinical use, patient characteristics, feasibility, and safety of cerebral autoregulation testing in children aged <18 years between 2014 and 2021. A clinical order set with a protocol for cerebral autoregulation testing was introduced in 2018. Results: 25 (24 severe TBI and 1 mild TBI) children, median age 13 years [IQR 4.5; 15] and median admission GCS 3[IQR 3; 3.5]) underwent 61 cerebral autoregulation tests during the first 16 days after admission [IQR1.5; 7; range 0-16]. Testing was more common after implementation of the order set (n = 16, 64% after the order set vs. n = 9, 36% before the order set) and initiated during the first 2 days. During testing, patients were mechanically ventilated (n = 60, 98.4%), had invasive arterial blood pressure monitoring (n = 60, 98.4%), had intracranial pressure monitoring (n = 56, 90.3%), brain-tissue oxygenation monitoring (n = 56, 90.3%), and external ventricular drain (n = 13, 25.5%). Most patients received sedation and analgesia for intracranial pressure control (n = 52; 83.8%) and vasoactive support (n = 55, 90.2%) during testing. Cerebral autoregulation testing was completed in 82% (n = 50 tests); 11 tests were not completed [high intracranial pressure (n = 5), high blood pressure (n = 2), bradycardia (n = 2), low cerebral perfusion pressure (n = 1), or intolerance to blood pressure cuff inflation (n = 1)]. Impaired cerebral autoregulation on first assessment resulted in repeat testing (80% impaired vs. 23% intact, RR 2.93, 95% CI 1.06:8.08, p = 0.03). Seven out of 50 tests (14%) resulted in a change in cerebral hemodynamic targets. Conclusion: Findings from this series of children with TBI indicate that: (1) Availability of clinical order set with protocol facilitated clinical cerebral autoregulation testing, (2) Clinicians ordered cerebral autoregulation tests in children with severe TBI receiving high therapeutic intensity and repeatedly with impaired status on the first test, (3) Clinical cerebral autoregulation testing is feasible and safe, and (4) Testing results led to change in hemodynamic targets in some patients.

Intraoperative MRI for Adult and Pediatric Neurosurgery.

Intraoperative MRI (iMRI) technology and its use in both adult and pediatric neurosurgery have advanced significantly over the past 2 decades, allowing neurosurgeons to account for brain shift and optimize resection of brain lesions. Combining the risks of the MR environment with those of the operating room creates a challenging, zero-tolerance environment for the anesthesiologist. This article provides an overview of the currently available iMRI systems, the neurosurgical evidence supporting iMRI use, and the anesthetic and safety considerations for iMRI procedures.

Perceived Benefits and Barriers to a Career in Neuroanesthesiology: A Pilot Survey of Anesthesiology Clinicians.

BACKGROUND: Despite advances in perioperative neuroscience, there is low interest among anesthesiology trainees to pursue subspecialty training in neuroanesthesiology. We conducted a pilot survey to assess attitudes about neuroanesthesiology fellowship training. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A confidential survey was distributed to an international cohort of anesthesiology attendings and trainees between January 15, 2017 and February 26, 2017. RESULTS: A total of 463 responses were received. Overall, 309 (67%), 30 (6%), 116 (25%), and 8 (2%) of respondents identified themselves as attendings, fellows, residents, and "other," respectively. In total, 390 (84%) of respondents were from the United States. Individuals typically pursue anesthesiology fellowship training because of interest in the subspecialty, acquisition of a special skill set, and the role of fellowship training in career planning and advancement. Overall, 64% of attendings, 56% of fellows, and 55% of residents favored accreditation of neuroanesthesiology fellowships, although opinion was divided regarding the role of accreditation in increasing interest in the specialty. Respondents believe that increased opportunities for research and greater exposure to neurocritical care and neurological monitoring methods would increase interest in neuroanesthesiology fellowship training. Perceived barriers to neuroanesthesiology fellowship training were perceptions that residency provides adequate training in neuroanesthesiology, that a unique skill set is not acquired, and that there are limited job opportunities available to those with neuroanesthesiology fellowship training. CONCLUSIONS: In this pilot survey, we identified several factors that trainees consider when deciding to undertake subspecialty training and barriers that might limit interest in pursuing neuroanesthesiology subspecialty training. Our findings may be used to guide curricular development and identify factors that might increase interest among trainees in pursuing neuroanesthesiology fellowship training.